Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gates of Hades
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Wild Falls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Sweet Kingdom
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sweets
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gates of Hades vs Wild Falls
- Different format families: Gates of Hades is Cascading reels, Wild Falls is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gates of Hades returns more in theory over the long run, while Wild Falls reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Gates of Hades vs Sweet Kingdom
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.52% against 96.52%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
