Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gates of Olympus POP
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 97.05%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
VS
Buffalo Win
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Gates of Olympus POP is Cascading reels, Buffalo Win is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 97.05% against 96.71% — Gates of Olympus POP is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buffalo Win does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gates of Olympus POP returns more in theory over the long run, while Buffalo Win reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
