Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gates of Olympus Xmas 1000
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 15,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
VS
Shark Feast
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 40,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Gates of Olympus Xmas 1000 is Cascading reels, Shark Feast is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.20% — Gates of Olympus Xmas 1000 is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.7×: 15,000× against 40,000×, with Shark Feast higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gates of Olympus Xmas 1000 returns more in theory over the long run, while Shark Feast reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
