Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Gates of Pyroth

Pragmatic Play

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
Not published
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →
VS

Le Hooligan

Hacksaw Gaming

Format family
Cluster pays
RTP
96.34%
Volatility
Not published
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
Not published
Theme signals
Not published
VS

Reactoonz 100

Play’n GO

Format family
Standard video slot
RTP
96.20%
Volatility
Very high
Win cap
10,000×
Reels
7
Theme signals
Not published
Free demo available →

Reading the difference

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Gates of Pyroth vs Le Hooligan

  • Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Gates of Pyroth does not publish one.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.

Gates of Pyroth vs Reactoonz 100

  • Different format families: Gates of Pyroth is Cluster pays, Reactoonz 100 is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
  • They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
  • RTP cannot be compared: Gates of Pyroth does not publish one.
  • Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
  • Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.

Add to the comparison (up to four)

Add to the comparison (up to four)