Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gates of Valhalla
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth, East Asia
VS
Fortune Horse
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Gates of Valhalla is Cascading reels, Fortune Horse is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.46% against 96.76% — Fortune Horse is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Horse does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
