Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gates of Valhalla
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth, East Asia
VS
Tales of Asgard: Loki's Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Norse myth, East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Gates of Valhalla is Cascading reels, Tales of Asgard: Loki's Fortune is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.46% against 96.20% — Gates of Valhalla is 0.26 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 10,000× against 20,000×, with Tales of Asgard: Loki's Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Gates of Valhalla returns more in theory over the long run, while Tales of Asgard: Loki's Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth, East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
