Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gems Bonanza
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 12,300×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Knockout Riches
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Gems Bonanza is Cascading reels, Knockout Riches is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.75% — Knockout Riches is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 12,300× against 10,000×, with Gems Bonanza higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Knockout Riches does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Knockout Riches returns more in theory over the long run, while Gems Bonanza reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
