Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Goblin Heist Powernudge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cash Vandal
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.47% against 96.47%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 4,000× against 5,000×, with Cash Vandal higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
