Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gold Oasis
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.06%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,260×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Rascal Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.23%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 9,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
PIZZA! PIZZA? PIZZA!
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,200×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Gold Oasis vs Rascal Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.06% against 96.23% — Rascal Riches is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 7,260× against 9,000×, with Rascal Riches higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Gold Oasis vs PIZZA! PIZZA? PIZZA!
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.06% against 96.04%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 7,260× and 7,200×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
