Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Gold Rush
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 1,700×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Rich Wilde and the Tome of Madness
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.59%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.59% — Rich Wilde and the Tome of Madness is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 1,700× against 2,000×, with Rich Wilde and the Tome of Madness higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
