Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP: 96.64% against 96.54% — Great Reef is 0.10 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 3,000× and 3,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Great Reef does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Great Reef returns more in theory over the long run, while Release the Bison reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.64% against 96.64%.
Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 3,000× against 2,500×, with Great Reef higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Great Reef does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Cloud Quest returns more in theory over the long run, while Great Reef reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Add to the comparison (up to four)