Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

Microgaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.15% — Great Rhino is 0.38 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.1×: 900× against 800×, with Great Rhino higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.56%.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)