Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Great Rhino Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Buffalo Win
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Great Rhino Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Buffalo Win is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.71% — Buffalo Win is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 20,000× against 25,000×, with Buffalo Win higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buffalo Win does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
