Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

PG Soft

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Different format families: Great Rhino Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Buffalo Win is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.71% — Buffalo Win is 0.13 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 20,000× against 25,000×, with Buffalo Win higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Buffalo Win does not publish a rating.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Different format families: Great Rhino Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Catfish Hunters is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.58% against 96.03% — Great Rhino Megaways™ is 0.55 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 20,000× and 20,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Catfish Hunters does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Great Rhino Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Catfish Hunters reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)