Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Happy Hooves
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Street Magic
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Drill that Gold
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Happy Hooves vs Street Magic
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.49% against 96.48%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Happy Hooves returns more in theory over the long run, while Street Magic reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Happy Hooves vs Drill that Gold
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.49% against 96.49%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
