Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Heart of Cleopatra
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Spellbinding Mystery
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.04%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cluster pays. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.48% against 96.04% — Heart of Cleopatra is 0.44 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Heart of Cleopatra returns more in theory over the long run, while Spellbinding Mystery reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
