Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Hearts of Venus
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Buffalo Win
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.71%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Spin Party
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 25,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Music & party
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Hearts of Venus vs Buffalo Win
- Different format families: Hearts of Venus is Cascading reels, Buffalo Win is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.71% — Buffalo Win is 0.21 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Buffalo Win does not publish a rating.
Hearts of Venus vs Spin Party
- Different format families: Hearts of Venus is Cascading reels, Spin Party is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.51%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 25,000× and 25,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
