Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Helios - Triple Sun
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Cash Vandal
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 4
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Cosmic Clusters!
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.45%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Sci-fi & neon
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Helios - Triple Sun vs Cash Vandal
- Different format families: Helios - Triple Sun is Cascading reels, Cash Vandal is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.46% against 96.47%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Helios - Triple Sun vs Cosmic Clusters!
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.46% against 96.45%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Helios - Triple Sun returns more in theory over the long run, while Cosmic Clusters! reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
