Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.55% — Beautiful Bones is 0.54 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.01% against 96.18% — Wild Blood 2 is 0.17 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.

Add to the comparison (up to four)