Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Ice Mints
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Queens of Ra
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Egypt
VS
Wild Falls
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Ice Mints vs Queens of Ra
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.20% — Ice Mints is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Ice Mints vs Wild Falls
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
