Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jade Butterfly
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.47%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Dragon Maiden
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Koi Pond
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Jade Butterfly vs Dragon Maiden
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.47% against 96.49%.
- Win caps differ by about 3.6×: 1,400× against 5,000×, with Dragon Maiden higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Jade Butterfly vs Koi Pond
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- RTP cannot be compared: Koi Pond does not publish one.
- Win caps differ by about 1.8×: 1,400× against 2,500×, with Koi Pond higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Koi Pond does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
