Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Jade Legends
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
24k Dragon
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 24,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Jade Legends is Cascading reels, 24k Dragon is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.20% — Jade Legends is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.2×: 20,000× against 24,000×, with 24k Dragon higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Jade Legends returns more in theory over the long run, while 24k Dragon reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
