Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Joker's Revenge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Hot Safari
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Joker's Revenge vs Hot Safari
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.17% — Joker's Revenge is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 10,000× against 4,000×, with Joker's Revenge higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Joker's Revenge vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.56%.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
