Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Joker's Revenge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Hot Safari
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Animals
VS
Werewolf's Hunt
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.75%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Joker's Revenge vs Hot Safari
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.17% — Joker's Revenge is 0.34 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.5×: 10,000× against 4,000×, with Joker's Revenge higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Joker's Revenge vs Werewolf's Hunt
- Different format families: Joker's Revenge is Fixed paylines, Werewolf's Hunt is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.75% — Werewolf's Hunt is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Werewolf's Hunt does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
