Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Knights vs Barbarians
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
CULT.
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Mystic Potion
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Knights vs Barbarians vs CULT.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.51%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Knights vs Barbarians vs Mystic Potion
- Different format families: Knights vs Barbarians is Fixed paylines, Mystic Potion is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.51% against 96.70% — Mystic Potion is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mystic Potion does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
