Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lady Godiva
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.54%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 2,400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Chilli Heat
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 2,512×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Cruise Royale
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.65%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lady Godiva vs Chilli Heat
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.54% against 96.52%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,400× and 2,512×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lady Godiva returns more in theory over the long run, while Chilli Heat reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Lady Godiva vs Cruise Royale
- Different format families: Lady Godiva is Fixed paylines, Cruise Royale is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.54% against 96.65% — Cruise Royale is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,400× and 2,500×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Cruise Royale does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
