Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lava Balls
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 4,800×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Playboy Gems and Desires
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fruit & classic, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.01% — Lava Balls is 0.49 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,800× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lava Balls returns more in theory over the long run, while Playboy Gems and Desires reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
