Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lobster House
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.51%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Vampires vs Wolves
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 4,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Horror
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.51% against 96.49%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 4,000× and 4,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lobster House returns more in theory over the long run, while Vampires vs Wolves reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
