Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Bull
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Mahjong 88
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.62%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.55% against 96.62% — Mahjong 88 is 0.07 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
