Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Microgaming

Nolimit City

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.07% — Lucky Dog is 0.43 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Different format families: Lucky Dog is Fixed paylines, Coins of Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.48%.
Win caps differ by about 6.0×: 1,000× against 6,015×, with Coins of Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Coins of Fortune does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lucky Dog returns more in theory over the long run, while Coins of Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.

Add to the comparison (up to four)