Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Lightning
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
VS
Frozen Gems
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 0
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
Lucky Rainbow Rush
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 6
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Lightning vs Frozen Gems
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.48% against 96.36% — Lucky Lightning is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,100× and 10,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Wealth.
Lucky Lightning vs Lucky Rainbow Rush
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Lucky Rainbow Rush does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
