Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Microgaming

Play’n GO

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.27% — Lucky Monkey is 0.23 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Heavenly Elephant Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility labels differ: Medium against Low. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lucky Monkey returns more in theory over the long run, while Heavenly Elephant Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals, Wealth.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.20% — Lucky Monkey is 0.30 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 5,000× against 4,000×, with Lucky Monkey higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)