Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Mouse
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.57%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Wild Pixies
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.48%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 700×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Fortune Mouse
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.96%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 1,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Mouse vs Wild Pixies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.57% against 96.48% — Lucky Mouse is 0.09 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 1,000× against 700×, with Lucky Mouse higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Lucky Mouse vs Fortune Mouse
- Different format families: Lucky Mouse is Fixed paylines, Fortune Mouse is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.57% against 96.96% — Fortune Mouse is 0.39 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 1,000× and 1,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Mouse does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
