Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Phoenix
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Lucky Panda
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Funky Fortunez
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.74%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Phoenix vs Lucky Panda
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,000× and 2,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Lucky Phoenix vs Funky Fortunez
- Different format families: Lucky Phoenix is Fixed paylines, Funky Fortunez is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.74% — Funky Fortunez is 0.24 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,000× and 2,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Funky Fortunez does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
