Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Lucky Phoenix
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Lucky Panda
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Planet Fortune
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 2,500×
- Reels
- 500
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Lucky Phoenix vs Lucky Panda
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 2,000× and 2,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Lucky Phoenix vs Planet Fortune
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.50% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 2,000× against 2,500×, with Planet Fortune higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Medium.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
