Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Magic Crystals
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.36%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 600×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Beautiful Bones
Microgaming
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.55%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Horror
VS
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Magic Crystals vs Beautiful Bones
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.36% against 96.55% — Beautiful Bones is 0.19 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Magic Crystals vs Supreme Zeus
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Ways to win. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.36% against 96.39%.
- Win caps differ by about 20.8×: 600× against 12,500×, with Supreme Zeus higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Supreme Zeus does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
