Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Magic Journey
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.54%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 400×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
Rise of Merlin
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.58%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.54% against 96.58%.
- Win caps differ by about 12.5×: 400× against 5,000×, with Rise of Merlin higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Very high against High. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
