Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mahjong Wins Super Scatter
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
VS
Lucky Piggy
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.79%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 20,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Mahjong Wins Super Scatter is Cascading reels, Lucky Piggy is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.79% — Lucky Piggy is 0.29 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 5.0×: 100,000× against 20,000×, with Mahjong Wins Super Scatter higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Lucky Piggy does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Lucky Piggy returns more in theory over the long run, while Mahjong Wins Super Scatter reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia, Animals.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
