Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Mahjong Wins Triple Pot
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Double Fortune
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.22%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 100,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Different format families: Mahjong Wins Triple Pot is Cascading reels, Double Fortune is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.22% — Mahjong Wins Triple Pot is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 100,000× and 100,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Double Fortune does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Mahjong Wins Triple Pot returns more in theory over the long run, while Double Fortune reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
