Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Medusa's Stone
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.46%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 7,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
VS
Rise of Olympus
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Medium
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.46% against 96.50%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.4×: 7,000× against 5,000×, with Medusa's Stone higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility labels differ: Low against Medium. The label describes how widely outcomes scatter, not whether one game is better.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rise of Olympus returns more in theory over the long run, while Medusa's Stone reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Greek myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
