Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Play’n GO

PG Soft

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.64% against 96.64%.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 955× and 920×.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Sea Hunter returns more in theory over the long run, while Mighty Kong reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.

Different format families: Mighty Kong is Fixed paylines, Gem Saviour is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.64% against 96.82% — Gem Saviour is 0.18 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Both cap out at roughly the same place: 955× and 1,000×.
Volatility cannot be compared: Gem Saviour does not publish a rating.

Add to the comparison (up to four)