Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Moleionaire
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Piranha Pays
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.20%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Outsourced
Nolimit City
- Format family
- Ways to win
- RTP
- 96.08%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Moleionaire vs Piranha Pays
- Different format families: Moleionaire is Cascading reels, Piranha Pays is Fixed paylines. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.08% against 96.20% — Piranha Pays is 0.12 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
Moleionaire vs Outsourced
- Different format families: Moleionaire is Cascading reels, Outsourced is Ways to win. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Nolimit City — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.08% against 96.08%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 5,000× and 5,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Outsourced does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
