Structure comparison

Two games, side by side

The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Pragmatic Play

Pragmatic Play

Hacksaw Gaming

Reading the difference

Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.53% against 96.53%.
Win caps differ by about 4.5×: 200× against 900×, with Great Rhino higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
Published RTP: 96.53% against 96.20% — Monkey Madness is 0.33 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
Win caps differ by about 12.5×: 200× against 2,500×, with Magic Piggy OG higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
Volatility cannot be compared: Magic Piggy OG does not publish a rating.
Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Monkey Madness returns more in theory over the long run, while Magic Piggy OG reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Shared theme signals: Animals.

Add to the comparison (up to four)