Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Panda's Fortune
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.17%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,800×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Wildies
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.01%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 7,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Fortune Horse
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.76%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- 3
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Panda's Fortune vs Wildies
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.17% against 96.01% — Panda's Fortune is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 7,800× and 7,500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Panda's Fortune vs Fortune Horse
- Different format families: Panda's Fortune is Fixed paylines, Fortune Horse is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.17% against 96.76% — Fortune Horse is 0.59 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 7,800× against 10,000×, with Fortune Horse higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Fortune Horse does not publish a rating.
- Shared theme signals: East Asia.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
