Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pirate Golden Age
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.49%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 3,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Treasure Stacks
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- Not published
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
VS
Treasure Wild
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.53%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 4,500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Adventure, Wealth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pirate Golden Age vs Treasure Stacks
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- RTP cannot be compared: Treasure Stacks does not publish one.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure, Wealth.
Pirate Golden Age vs Treasure Wild
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.49% against 96.53%.
- Win caps differ by about 1.5×: 3,000× against 4,500×, with Treasure Wild higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Shared theme signals: Adventure, Wealth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
