Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Pixie Wings
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.67%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Triple Tigers
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.52%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 500×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
VS
Mermaids Millions
Microgaming
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.56%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- Not published
- Reels
- 5
- Theme signals
- Greek myth, Animals
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Pixie Wings vs Triple Tigers
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.67% against 96.52% — Pixie Wings is 0.15 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 500× and 500×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Pixie Wings returns more in theory over the long run, while Triple Tigers reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Pixie Wings vs Mermaids Millions
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Microgaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.67% against 96.56% — Pixie Wings is 0.11 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
