Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Plushie Wins
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.84%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Rage to Riches
Play’n GO
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 97.12%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 75×
- Reels
- 75
- Theme signals
- Wealth
VS
888 Dragons
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Fixed paylines
- RTP
- 96.84%
- Volatility
- Low
- Win cap
- 100×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- East Asia
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Plushie Wins vs Rage to Riches
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Play’n GO — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.84% against 97.12% — Rage to Riches is 0.28 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 1.3×: 100× against 75×, with Plushie Wins higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Rage to Riches returns more in theory over the long run, while Plushie Wins reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Plushie Wins vs 888 Dragons
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Fixed paylines. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP is effectively identical: 96.84% against 96.84%.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 100× and 100×.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Low.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
