Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Power of Merlin Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.09%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 40,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
VS
The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.44%
- Volatility
- High
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Fantasy
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.09% against 96.44% — The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew is 0.35 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 8.0×: 40,000× against 5,000×, with Power of Merlin Megaways™ higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: High.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. The Magic Cauldron - Enchanted Brew returns more in theory over the long run, while Power of Merlin Megaways™ reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Fantasy.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
