Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.
Power of Thor Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.97%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 5,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
VS
Viking Forge
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.05%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Norse myth
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
- Both titles are built on the same format family: Cascading reels. Differences between them therefore come from tuning, not from structure.
- Published RTP: 96.97% against 96.05% — Power of Thor Megaways™ is 0.92 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Win caps differ by about 2.0×: 5,000× against 10,000×, with Viking Forge higher. A cap is a rulebook ceiling, not an expectation.
- Both carry the same volatility label: Very high.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Power of Thor Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Viking Forge reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
- Shared theme signals: Norse myth.
Add to the comparison (up to four)
