Structure comparison
Two games, side by side
The structural difference between two games, assembled from published specifications only. Nothing here forecasts a result or recommends either game.

Raging Waterfall Megaways™
Pragmatic Play
- Format family
- Cascading reels
- RTP
- 96.50%
- Volatility
- Very high
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS
Le Hooligan
Hacksaw Gaming
- Format family
- Cluster pays
- RTP
- 96.34%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
VS

Mystic Potion
PG Soft
- Format family
- Standard video slot
- RTP
- 96.70%
- Volatility
- Not published
- Win cap
- 10,000×
- Reels
- Not published
- Theme signals
- Not published
Reading the difference
Reading the difference
Some dimensions are excluded because one studio does not publish that figure.
Raging Waterfall Megaways™ vs Le Hooligan
- Different format families: Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Le Hooligan is Cluster pays. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and Hacksaw Gaming — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.34% — Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is 0.16 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Le Hooligan does not publish a rating.
- Worth noticing: the higher RTP and the higher win cap sit on opposite sides. Raging Waterfall Megaways™ returns more in theory over the long run, while Le Hooligan reaches further at its ceiling. The two numbers answer different questions.
Raging Waterfall Megaways™ vs Mystic Potion
- Different format families: Raging Waterfall Megaways™ is Cascading reels, Mystic Potion is Standard video slot. Read each screen with its own rule set.
- They come from different studios — Pragmatic Play and PG Soft — which is what makes the comparison useful: the same problem, two house styles.
- Published RTP: 96.50% against 96.70% — Mystic Potion is 0.20 points higher. RTP is a long-run theoretical figure, not a session forecast.
- Both cap out at roughly the same place: 10,000× and 10,000×.
- Volatility cannot be compared: Mystic Potion does not publish a rating.
Add to the comparison (up to four)



